|
DR MELANIE LIEBENBERG
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Presiding over, but not necessarily altogether happy with the way his Kingdom is going.
Dr. Melanie Liebenberg was the woman who failed to carry out the proper examination of Briony Weston-Smyth, after she realised that the 15 year old schoolgirl was still a virgin.
She testified in the Hove Crown Court, telling the Jury that marks she knew were naturally occurring in all females, no matter their age, were suspicious. When as a matter of medical fact, they are not. She deliberately misled the Jury, after the trial Judge told the Jury to make of her evidence what they will.
Victor's legal team knew about this, and failed to instruct an independent medical expert, we think because they had already done a deal with the CPS to get von Wolffe convicted. Julian Dale was provided with a 300 page evidence bundle, but failed to use all but a few pages.
Liebenberg also failed to declare a potential conflict of interest, where she worked for the same Trust as Briony's mother and grandmother. Shannon, being a community psychiatric nurse, operating in the Eastbourne area.
Historic sex allegations are notoriously difficult to defend, but in this case studies already published in the United States were available to British medics. We believe that Dr Liebenberg would have known about them, meaning that she perjured herself in Court, so perverting the course of justice. The CCRC also knew about the US studies, and Liebenberg's untuths, but in Horizon Post Office fashion and R (Hallam & Nealon) v. Secretary of State for Justice (2019), a case which exposed the CCRC’s reluctance to refer cases and the lack of accountability they still refused to refer this case back to the court of appeal.
Briony would now be some thirty-three years old, at time of writing.
NOTE: The complainant's name has been changed to protect her identity, in her forward life. As with the names of her immediate family. This was at the request of the victim, who is known as Victor von Woolfe in this docu-drama based on real events. In recognition, that he called off an engagement to the complainant's mother, and perhaps, should not have proposed, to raise expectations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where a breakdown in a relationship or a domestic grievance turns into a devastatingly weaponized false allegation—is the nightmare scenario for any defense lawyer, and it lies at the absolute center of debates around reforming sexual offenses law. In this case, Julian Dale and Tim Stirmey, had no stomach for putting up a fight, with very limited legal aid funding to carve up, it appears that instead of challenging the medical evidence, they just took what cash they could, and sold their client down the river. Allegedly. You can make up your mind, as your read and review the evidence for yourselves.
Although pure fiction, Fatal Attraction, The Fugitive, and Double Jeopardy are three films that spring to mind.
...
REFERENCE
https://
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please use our MORAL COMPASS to navigate this story, or revisit our LANDING PAGE
|
