|
JULIAN DALE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Presiding over, but not necessarily altogether happy with the way his Kingdom is going.
Julian Dale is the barrister who works with Tim Stirmey (duty solicitor) to help Sussex police to frame Victor von Woolfe, by failing to obtain an independent expert to challenge the state's medical evidence.
They also failed to obtain the claimants VHS tapes. That must have been visible on photographs of the so-called crime scene.
Briony Weston-Smythe had a collection of "The Bill," and "Casualty" VHS tapes, which undid her statement that she did not know having sexual relations with Victor would have been wrong.
In reality, Briony was obsessed with television programs that explained how the police and hospital staff detect and deal with sexual assault cases. Detectives Staker and Constable James Hookway knew the existence of these tapes in Briony's bedroom, would be crucial evidence for the defence, but failed to disclose them.
What is more, Mr Dale knew about Sussex police, failing to investigate planning crimes, reported by Victor, with 11 other petitioners, to Wealden District Council, subsequently referred to the police. And that because Victor kept on raising these issues for over five years, the council continued to ask the police for help, such as in 1998, Wealden's officers fraudulently accusing Victor of having firearms. When the planning officers knew they were ordinary air rifles. Mr Dale knew this was a potential conflict of interests, but failed to ask Sussex police to recuse themselves, or introduce this argument in Victor's trial, or make application to dismiss the case, as an abuse of process. Dale said: "You can't expect me to raise this as an argument before the jury?" Victor said: "I fully expect you to represent me, so that the jury know the background to this allegation."
Dale this allowed a contaminated case, in R v Sussex Justices 1924 terms, to go to trial.
DC Staker interviews Victor in such a way, that their victim believes the detective, when he says the girl has been assaulted. When, in reality, she was vaginally intact. This only became clear once the CPS disclosed a medical report from Dr Melanie Liebenberg, revealing that Briony's hymen was intact, and could not be opened with labial traction. Tim Stirmey allowed Victor to answer questions that he must have known would damage his defence. Julian Dale failed to get the interview disallowed, on the basis of entrapment.
NOTE: ....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where a breakdown in a relationship or a domestic grievance turns into a devastatingly weaponized false allegation—is the nightmare scenario for any defense lawyer, and it lies at the absolute center of debates around reforming sexual offenses law. In this case, Julian Dale and Tim Stirmey, had no stomach for putting up a fight, with very limited legal aid funding to carve up, it appears that instead of challenging the medical evidence, they just took what cash they could, and sold their client down the river. Allegedly. You can make up your mind, as your read and review the evidence for yourselves.
Although pure fiction, Fatal Attraction, The Fugitive, and Double Jeopardy are three films that spring to mind.
...
REFERENCE
https://
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please use our MORAL COMPASS to navigate this story, or revisit our LANDING PAGE
|
