|
DS KEITH LYNDSEY
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Presiding over, but not necessarily altogether happy with the way his Kingdom is going.
Detective Sergeant Keith Lyndsey was the main contact, investigating officer in the case of a Petition in 1997, from 11 unrelated complainants, including Victor von Woolfe. The Petitioners alleged corruption in Wealden District Council, under Derek Holness, and by implication, East Sussex County Council.
(The standard
is at Paragraph 3.5 of the Code of Practice issued under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act (CPIA) 1996. It explicitly dictates:
Failing to investigate a crime, especially one as serious as the above, is a crime in itself. The CPS would have known from the lack of investigation on the part of DS Lyndsey, that he, and other Sussex police officers (Paul Whitehouse) were guilty, allegedly, of willfully, failing to perform his/their duty, as in R v Dytham 1979.
Indeed, there was an understanding between police officers that they would work together, and with Wealden's planning officers and chief executive, to whitewash the planning corruption that had been reported. A conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Whereas, they had a common law duty to investigate these crimes, as per R v Dytham 1979. But, just like Philip Thomas Dytham, they did nothing at all to protect the members of the public, who were reporting these crimes.
Instead, where Victor continued to report the planning crimes, he became a target, that Sussex police had to rid themselves of. They needed to trap him, convict him of a crime that would give them the power to monitor and control his life. To pressure him into abandoning his claims, that the Petitioner's crimes had not been investigated.
NOTE: ....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where a breakdown in a relationship or a domestic grievance turns into a devastatingly weaponized false allegation—is the nightmare scenario for any defense lawyer, and it lies at the absolute center of debates around reforming sexual offenses law. In this case, Julian Dale and Tim Stirmey, had no stomach for putting up a fight, with very limited legal aid funding to carve up, it appears that instead of challenging the medical evidence, they just took what cash they could, and sold their client down the river. Allegedly. You can make up your mind, as your read and review the evidence for yourselves.
Although pure fiction, Fatal Attraction, The Fugitive, and Double Jeopardy are three films that spring to mind.
...
REFERENCE
https://
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please use our MORAL COMPASS to navigate this story, or revisit our LANDING PAGE
|
