Presiding over, but not necessarily altogether happy with the way his Kingdom is going.

Kier Starmer was a CPS prosecutor before he got himself elected on a pack of lies for a manifesto, allegedly, that he failed to implement quite spectacularly, and was more than happy to endorse the Sexual Offences Act 2003, despite the Article 6 perversity. Taking the British justice system back to the dark ages, of witch trials. The drowning of women accused of witch craft, as a means to rid men of intelligent women. A complete role reversal, allowing women past 2003, to rid themselves of men, just by making a convincing accusation.

With social services coaching them, all the way. Why not just bring back lynching?

Starmer features in "Victor Unchained," fictionally. In scenarios that one might imagine a beleaguered PM might take an interest, as it may detract from his popularity, or test his morals, not wanting to upset more applecarts, on his way to retirement, or a possible return to practicing as a lawyer.

Couple that with appointing Lord Mandelson, a friend of Jeffrey Epstein, and you may care to agree, that politics is truly mixed up in the United Kingdom. In "Muzzled" Kier Starmer was employed by the crown prosecution service, department of public prosecutions. That is real and factual. In "Victor Unchained," Kier Starmer is the disgraced former prime minister, in a fictional setting. Working with his Cabinet friend, David Lammy, to keep tabs on Victor, with GCHQ working with MAPPA, since he has a vested interest in making his premiership appear less clown like, than it actually was. 

Then, Starmer was forced to resign. And the players changed, yet again.

Keir Starmer, faced significant criticism for failing to deliver on several key promises made during his leadership campaign and subsequent elections.

Key Broken Promises

1. Tuition Fees: One of the most significant promises was the abolition of tuition fees. Starmer initially pledged to scrap tuition fees, a policy that resonated with many young voters. However, this promise was later abandoned, leaving students and their families scratching their heads in disbelief.

2. Nationalisation of Public Services: Starmer's leadership campaign included a commitment to nationalise key public services, such as rail, mail, and energy. Despite the initial enthusiasm, these plans were scaled back, with the Labour Party opting for a more moderate approach. In other words he exaggerated which seems to be normal for Pinocchio's brother.

3. Winter Fuel Payments: Another broken promise was the commitment to maintain winter fuel payments for pensioners. The Labour Party's decision to strip up to 10 million pensioners of this lifeline has sparked outrage and concern, particularly among vulnerable elderly population.

5. Labour made a promise not to raise taxes at least 52 times during the election campaign, before hiking National Insurance months later. Labour repeatedly vowed during the 2024 General Election campaign that it would not raise taxes on "working people", in a promise made at least 52 times by Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and a slew of Labour MPs. The pledge was written into the party’s manifesto, which stated: "Labour will not increase taxes on working people [...] we will ensure taxes on working people are kept as low as possible", with the Prime Minister even saying to the Sunday Express that it was "cast iron". Keir Starmer was asked again, by the Press Association in June 2024, and told them twice that there would be no tax hikes on working people under his Government, saying he was “very happy” to confirm it.

On the same day, Rachel Reeves said so in a BBC News interview, saying: “Labour has no plans to increase taxes on working people” and “I have ruled out increases in income tax, National Insurance and VAT for the duration of the next parliament.” She even placed the commitment on the social media platform X, alongside Pat MCFadden, one of Starmers' inner circle. The UK's borrowing increased to underpin unsustainable policies. Making a mockery of the tax rises, when simply cutting the number of civil servants and council employees, and forcing a return to the empty offices, of the work at home brigade, would increase productivity and administrative efficiency.

Other Issues

The introduction of a dysfunctional Personal Identification Number (PIN) for directors of companies and other government services, such as driving licences, was another Labour foul up. With ramifications similar to the Horizon Post Office scandal.

A lack of defence spending and leadership, led to armed forces way behind in the technological battlefield, that modern warfare demands. Kier was seen as being chicken, and the Royal Navy ineffective, in not supporting the US as to Iran and the Hormuz Strait.

He failed to set out an easily expressed political philosophy. Lacking the narrative glue that holds a governing project together, many of Labour’s decisions seemed arbitrary. Starmer floundered in part because “Starmerism” never existed.

Instead of a big-picture political idea, Starmer was meant to stand for due process. He entered politics in 2015 after a distinguished career in human rights law, which saw him become the director of public prosecutions. He served in the shadow cabinet of Labour’s hard-left leader Jeremy Corbyn. After a crushing election defeat in 2019, Starmer was chosen as Corbyn’s successor – seen as a safer pair of hands after Labour’s years of radicalism.

His government was also rattled by scandals. Starmer was criticized after it emerged that he had accepted more freebies than any other member of the previous parliament, including tickets to Taylor Swift concerts and Arsenal matches. While no rules were broken, the revelations conflicted with Starmer’s portrayal of himself as an antidote to the cronyism displayed by successive Conservative leaders.

Starmer has been called to the Bar in several Caribbean countries, where he defended convicts sentenced to the death penalty. In 1999, he was a junior barrister on Lee Clegg's appeal. Starmer assisted Helen Steel and David Morris in the McLibel case, at the trial and appeal in English courts, also representing them before the European Court of Human Rights.

Starmer was appointed Queen's Counsel on 9 April 2002, aged 39. In the same year, he became joint head of Doughty Street Chambers. In 2005 Starmer called his Queen's Counsel appointment "odd" as he had previously expressed support for the abolition of the monarchy.

Starmer wrote legal opinions and marched in protest against the Iraq War following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and said in 2015 that he believed the war was "not lawful under international law because there was no UN resolution expressly authorising it". He defended one of the Fairford Five who broke into the RAF Fairford military air base in 2003 and disabled equipment in order to disrupt military operations at the start of the Iraq War.

Starmer’s faults might have been forgiven if he were more charismatic, or if he had a bolder plan for government. But he came to resemble a manager, believing that Britain’s problems could be solved by mere tinkering, rather than radical change.

In lieu of a clear vision, Starmer instead promised hard, grudging work to “root out 14 years of rot.” He would mend Britain’s ties with Europe, strained after the painful Brexit negotiations, and improve relations with China, which had entered an “ice age” under the Conservatives. He would bring NHS waiting lists down, build new homes and cut people’s bills. It would not happen overnight, he cautioned. But the country wanted swifter results.

Starmer proved unpopular with the British public. His net approval rating began slightly positive but fell over the course of his premiership to an average of −46% by November 2025; an Ipsos poll that month indicated he was the least popular prime minister since its records began in 1977. Starmer also presided over a period of deep unpopularity towards Labour, with the party facing record electoral losses during the 2025 and 2026 local elections which culminated in a leadership crisis and his resignation.

In the end, the leader who was meant to stand for due process was brought down by his government’s failure to observe just that.

NOTE: ....