|
MOMO
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Presiding over, but not necessarily altogether happy with the way his Kingdom is going.
Momo was a person convicted of rape on evidence that had been manipulated by Sussex police to obtain a wrongful conviction. Victor read Momo's case file to discover that a urine sample had not been correctly stopped from fermenting, suggesting that the claimant in his case, was below the legal limit for alcoholic intoxication, and able to give consent.
This was an unusual case, where a jury convicted Momo of oral rape, but not vaginal rape. In our view somewhat implausible, since if the claimant was able to give consent to vaginal intercourse, she would have been capable of giving consent to suck his penis.
The laboratory receiving the urine sample, noticed that it was still fermenting. The police officer who collected the sample, was supposed to put a tablet in to neutralise and lock the sample, to stop alcohol production, but neglected to do so. For this reason, Momo's conviction is unsafe,
Dr. Elizabeth Carter was the medical expert in sexual assault and rape cases, part time resident at Lewes Prison, who worked with Sussex police on Momo's case, which revealed that a US Report existed before Victor's trial, that marks Dr Melanie Liebenberg would say were suspicious, were in fact, naturally occurring in all young females. Raising the inescapable conclusion that Sussex police conspired to keep Dr Carter as far away as possible from Victor's case, including contact with Melanie Libenberg.
Whereas, it is more likely, and it is alleged, that Dr Carter knew what was going on, and was simply told to look the other way by the chief constable of the day. Thus, was party to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
Briony would now be some thirty-three years old, at time of writing. Please come forward Dr Carter. You could help correct a gross miscarriage of justice.
NOTE: The complainant's name has been changed to protect her identity, in her forward life. As with the names of her immediate family. This was at the request of the victim, who is known as Victor von Woolfe in this docu-drama based on real events. In recognition, that he called off an engagement to the complainant's mother, and perhaps, should not have proposed, to raise expectations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where a breakdown in a relationship or a domestic grievance turns into a devastatingly weaponized false allegation—is the nightmare scenario for any defense lawyer, and it lies at the absolute center of debates around reforming sexual offenses law. In this case, Julian Dale and Tim Stirmey, had no stomach for putting up a fight, with very limited legal aid funding to carve up, it appears that instead of challenging the medical evidence, they just took what cash they could, and sold their client down the river. Allegedly. You can make up your mind, as your read and review the evidence for yourselves.
Although pure fiction, Fatal Attraction, The Fugitive, and Double Jeopardy are three films that spring to mind.
...
REFERENCE
https://
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please use our MORAL COMPASS to navigate this story, or revisit our LANDING PAGE
|
