The buck stops with his Majesty King Charles III, as head of state of the United Kingdom.

It's criminal. Yes, the Criminal Cases Review Commission operates much like the Local Government Ombudsman, the aim being to make it appear that there is a safety net, when in reality, and it is alleged, that they operate to prevent appeals against injustices being reviewed. Especially where if justice was served, the public would know that all is not well in the United Kingdom Limited, with the Firm at the helm, eyes tightly closed shut, except for where their lands and inheritance might be at stake. Then, it's all hands to the pumps to ensure the Monarchy is not abolished.

The British Bulldog referred his case to the CCRC in good faith between 2008 - 2013, but they refused to investigate the fact that Sussex police were involved in a cover up of institutionalised fraud, stemming from local government corruption, from 1997. In this case it was and is the Wealden District Council.

The CCRC’s real function is to protect public confidence in the justice system, not to overturn convictions that embarrass the state.

This fact leading to deliberate investigation shortcomings, designed to ensure that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), would gain a conviction, the aim being to beat their victim into submission, and prevent him from pursuing his claim to malicious prosecutions during several appeals to the Planning Inspectorate, Secretary of State. Hence, the State were in on it from at least 1986.

And that goes some way to explaining why the CCRC refused to investigate the Virginity issue, lack of proper procedure, and the Diary, that the defence were not allowed to see, leading to the Judge, Cedric Joseph, misdirecting the Jury on two important points, suggesting that this Judge might be a Mason, or in the alternative, completely incompetent. Contrary to Article 5 HRA 1998: a person has to be tried by a competent court.

Corruption and perverse policies are major issues to overcome. Until such matters are dealt with, the UK is held to be legally: "up shit creek without a paddle." Worse, endemic corruption prevents progress. Eventually, this corruption and the Royal family's links to slavery, will expose the institutionalised discrimination that flows from top to bottom. I.e., from Buckingham Palace to Councils everywhere in the UK. Including, Parish Councils, like Herstmonceux.

Queen Elizabeth was asked for help. She declined. The duty to provide an effective remedy, now rests with King Charles, until William becomes King. Or, is that Harry?

SEXUAL CASES ARE THE ULTIMATE TABOO - THAT IS WHY SUSSEX POLICE  HELPED STITCH UP WEALDEN'S LONG TERM ADVERSARY

CCRC caseworkers and judges fear:

- being accused of “siding with a sex offender,”

- being attacked by the press,

- damaging public confidence,

- or appearing “soft” on sexual crime.

So they avoid these cases — even when the evidence is overwhelming.

This is why they refused Victor’s case, despite referring two identical medical‑error cases.

This is not justice...... This is institutional cowardice.

Oddly, enough, in not wanting to correct injustices, does that make CCRC caseworkers, and judges - inverse sex offenders? Dodging their duty to correct injustices, could be seen and interpreted as defending the claimant's who have made false allegations. For fear that a (perhaps) latent tendency they secretly harbour, might be discovered! So, they come on strong in the courts and during reviews, to offset any hint that they might have had such thoughts! Or, that anyone might think they may have had such thoughts.

For sure, these institutional cowards are allowing perjury to go unchallenged, signaling to those making criminally unfounded allegations, that they can do that again, with impunity. Thus, setting the stage for more false allegations, and so making the United Kingdom a less safe place for (typically) single men, who might then become targets for dysfunctional families, to set traps for such potential male victims. In the full knowledge that the State has given them this unbridled power.

**“In vulnerable households, where emotions run high and boundaries are blurred, adolescents can be influenced — by fear, by loyalty, by adults, or by authority figures. When social services enter such an environment with a predetermined agenda, the risk of narrative manipulation becomes extreme.”**

The United Kingdom does not yet have a Written Constitution, leaving the justice system open to abuse via the honours system. [R v Sussex Justices 1924] Without justice being available to the ordinary man in the street, fairly, impartially and affordably, Britain can never truly be great again.

REFERENCE

https://www.